Women are talking about menopause online. Here’s what they’re asking
Online conversations reveal frustration with health care providers and persistent gaps in access to reliable information.
The Monitoring Lab is currently providing regular insights and real-time data dashboards on the four topics below. Select your topic of interest and area of practice to access data and insights tailored to your work.
The insights on these pages are based on the monitoring of publicly available data. While some insights reference specific false claims and conspiracy theories, others are included to indicate gaps in knowledge, concerns, speculation, and other trending narratives related to the topic. Inclusion in reporting is based on reach and velocity of spread and on whether conversations may impact health behaviors and decisions.
Dashboards are currently active across four health topics in the U.S. Click a topic below to explore the data at the national and regional levels.
Original reporting
Online conversations reveal frustration with health care providers and persistent gaps in access to reliable information.
Public discussion of mFlusiva has included substantial doubt and distrust, much of it carried over from COVID-19 vaccine conversations. Alongside that skepticism, people are asking practical questions about vaccine choice, eligibility, side effects, and access.
A year of online engagement with Michigan health departments found that people responded not only to what departments communicated about, but to the role they played: helping people access services, warning about risks, or acting as an authority.
A year of online conversation about flu, COVID-19, and RSV immunizations across California found that each vaccine generated distinct conversations. Differences in lived experience, perceived risk, and trust shape how people think about them, meaning combined messaging may miss what matters most.